Google luky.org euqset.org

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2.6.11-rc2-mm1: SuperIO scx200 breakage


From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:43:36PM +0300
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:54:49 +0100
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > It seems noone who reviewed the SuperIO patches noticed that there are 
> > now two modules "scx200" in the kernel...
> 
> They are almost mutually exlusive(SuperIO contains more advanced), 
> so I do not see any problem here.
> Only one of them can be loaded in a time.
> 
> So what does exactly bother you?
> 
lsmod in bugreports giving unspecific results, for example.

Kind regards,
Jurriaan
-- 
"So you believe."
Jewel ATerafin shrugged. "I have more than belief, but I don't have a
pressing need to convince you of anything."
	Michelle West - Sea of Sorrows.
Debian (Unstable) GNU/Linux 2.6.10-mm1 2x6078 bogomips load 0.52
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


$B$3$N>pJs$,$"$J$?$NC5$7$F$$?$b$N$+$I$&$+A*Br$7$F$/$@$5$!#(B
yes/$B$^$5$K$3$l$@!*(B   no/$B0c$&$J$!(B   part/$B0lIt8+$D$+$C$?(B   try/$B$3$l$G;n$7$F$_$k(B

$B$"$J$?$,C5$7$F$$?>pJs$O$I$N$h$&$J$3$H$+!"$4<+M3$K5-F~2<$5$!#FC$K!V$^$5$K$3$l$@!*!W$H8@$&>l9g$O5-F~$r$*4j$$7$^$9!#(B
$BNc(B:$B!VJ#?t$N%^%7%s$+$i(BCATV$B7PM3$G(Bipmasquerade$B$rMxMQ$7$F(BWeb$B$r;2>H$7$?$>l9g$N@_Dj$K$D$$F!W(B
Follow-Ups: References: