Re: [PATCH] BUG in io_destroy (fs/aio.c:1248)

[Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>]

"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> > So...  Will someone be sending a new patch?
> 
> Here's a cheesy patch that simply marks the ioctx as dead before
> destroying it.

super-cheesy, given that `ctx' is an unsigned long.

> +		spin_lock_irq(&ctx->ctx_lock);
> +		ctx->dead = 1;
> +		spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->ctx_lock);
> +

Even with this fixed up, the locking looks very odd.

Needs more work, please.  Or we just run with the original patch which I
assume was tested.  It's a rare error path and performance won't matter.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/