[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 1/3] dlm: use configfs
- From: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:23:48 -0700
- Organization: Oracle Corporation
- References: <20050818060750.GA10133@redhat.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Hi David,
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 02:07:50PM +0800, David Teigland wrote:
> +/*
> + * /config/dlm/<cluster>/spaces/<space>/nodes/<node>/nodeid
> + * /config/dlm/<cluster>/spaces/<space>/nodes/<node>/weight
> + * /config/dlm/<cluster>/comms/<comm>/nodeid
> + * /config/dlm/<cluster>/comms/<comm>/local
> + * /config/dlm/<cluster>/comms/<comm>/addr
> + * The <cluster> level is useless, but I haven't figured out how to avoid it.
> + */
So what happened to factoring out the common parts of
ocfs2_nodemanager? I was quite a big fan of that approach :) Or am I just
misunderstanding what these patches do?
--Mark
--
Mark Fasheh
Senior Software Developer, Oracle
mark.fasheh@xxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Follow-Ups:
References: