[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH/RFT 4/5] CLOCK-Pro page replacement
Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 21:48 -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 21:05:32 -0700
> > > Perhaps by uprevving the compiler version?
> > Can't be, we definitely support gcc-2.95 and that compiler
> > definitely has the bug on sparc64.
> I believe we just ignored sparc64. That usually works for solving these
> kind of bugs. 8)
heh. iirc, it was demonstrable on x86 also.
Dunno, it beats me. But it is the case that we now have lots of
uninitialised DEFINE_PER_CPUs and nobody's crashing. hm..
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/