Google luky.org euqset.org

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Schedulers benchmark - Was: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-5.2.4 for 2.6.12 and 2.6.13-rc6


Hi,

On 8/21/05, Con Kolivas <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 11:34, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> 
> Hi
> 
> > here are kernbench results:
> 
> Nice to see you using kernbench :)
> 
> > ./kernbench -M -o 128
> > [..]
> > Average Optimal -j 128 Load Run:
> 
> Was there any reason you chose 128? Optimal usually works out automatically
> from kernbench to 4x number_cpus. If I recall correctly you have 4 cpus? Not
> sure what 128 represents.
> 
> Cheers,
> Con
> 

No, I just have 1 pentium 4 with ht ;).

Why I chose 128? I just want very high loads. Now I'll try -j192 and
-j256, but I don't know how does my system survive it.

Regards,
Michal Piotrowski
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


$B$3$N>pJs$,$"$J$?$NC5$7$F$$?$b$N$+$I$&$+A*Br$7$F$/$@$5$!#(B
yes/$B$^$5$K$3$l$@!*(B   no/$B0c$&$J$!(B   part/$B0lIt8+$D$+$C$?(B   try/$B$3$l$G;n$7$F$_$k(B

$B$"$J$?$,C5$7$F$$?>pJs$O$I$N$h$&$J$3$H$+!"$4<+M3$K5-F~2<$5$!#FC$K!V$^$5$K$3$l$@!*!W$H8@$&>l9g$O5-F~$r$*4j$$7$^$9!#(B
$BNc(B:$B!VJ#?t$N%^%7%s$+$i(BCATV$B7PM3$G(Bipmasquerade$B$rMxMQ$7$F(BWeb$B$r;2>H$7$?$>l9g$N@_Dj$K$D$$F!W(B
Follow-Ups: References: